Technology, treatment coordination, and community resources need to be considered in any comprehensive evaluation of the healthcare problem. For better patient care and more efficient healthcare processes that lead to precise diagnosis and appropriate treatments, technology is important. In order to improve the lives of patients, decrease superfluous treatments, or avoid medical errors, effective care coordination is essential. NURS FPX 4900 Assessment 3: Assessing the Problem: Moreover, looking at community resources helps address the social determinants of health, promote general well-being, and minimize healthcare inequities. By carefully considering these factors, medical professionals may enhance patient-centered care, increase service efficiency, and boost healthcare quality and effectiveness (Kleinman et al., 2021). This study aims to develop care coordination strategies, resources in the community, and suitable equipment to address the COVID-19 problem.

Impact of Health Care Technology on Patients, Families, or Population Problem

It is stated that medical tools have been instrumental in alleviating the effects of COVID-19 on populations, loved ones, and patients. Telehealth, smartphone health applications, social distancing warnings, and telehealth have collectively revolutionized public health and healthcare delivery techniques. The utilization of smartphone apps or peripheral devices that activate social distancing alarms has enabled people to preserve a safe physical distance and prevent the spread of viruses (Radanliev et al., 2020). By informing users when they approach individuals who may be infected, these technologies significantly impede the propagation of COVID-19. As an example, the “SafeSpace” application advises users when they approach heavily populated zones, permitting them to make well-informed choices regarding their actions and engagements (Fentaw et al., 2022).

The creation of telehealth has significantly improved the accessibility of healthcare amidst the pandemic. By enabling patients to follow their conditions and receive medical attention remotely, the potential for viral exposure has been substantially reduced. One example is the widespread adoption of virtual doctor’s consultations through platforms such as Zoom, which guarantee continuous medical attention for chronic conditions while maintaining patient safety (Ng et al., 2022). Individuals are now able to follow their symptoms, obtain health information, and locate COVID-19 testing sites through the use of applications for mobile health. “COVID Symptom Tracker,” as well as comparable applications, enable users to conduct self-evaluations of their health and thus offer significant data that aid in the implementation of public health initiatives (Koehlmoos et al., 2020).

Advantages and Disadvantages

During the COVID-19 pandemic, advancements such as health applications, socially isolated alarms, and telehealth services have offered valuable assets, but they weren’t without their limitations. Although effective in prompting individuals to maintain a safe distance and consequently avoiding the spread of viruses, social isolation alarms may also be bothering and distracting (Tiwari et al., 2023). While telehealth provides an affordable way for patients and physicians to engage in remote consultations, it does not offer the advantages of practical evaluations that are inherent in in-person visits. Leading to containment efforts, mobile health apps enable users to monitor symptoms and obtain health information with ease; nonetheless, their privacy policies frequently lack accountability and robust data protections. Although unusual, conventional medical care should not be superseded by these (Sharma et al., 2022). Although these technologies could be helpful in the response to a pandemic, their limitations regarding unintended implications and access barriers must be taken into question.